PYCO1 56R
Protein Sequence
Sequence Variants
| ID | Name | Remain region | Mutation sites | Ref seq |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| psp02341 | PYCO1 | 1-595 | - | ✓ |
| psp02877 | PYCO1 56R | 1-1, 359-522, 583-595 | - | |
| psp00619 | PYCO1 45R | 1-1, 281-441, 583-595 | - | |
| psp00656 | PYCO1 2,6R | 1-1, 163-237, 441-522, 583-595 | - | |
| psp01017 | PYCO1 56RC | 1-1, 359-595 | - | |
| psp01249 | PYCO1 23R | 1-1, 163-280, 583-595 | - | |
| psp01325 | PYCO1 36RC | 1-1, 236-595 | - | |
| psp01670 | PYCO1 46RC | 1-1, 281-595 | - | |
| psp01841 | PYCO1 26RC | 1-1, 163-595 | - | |
| psp02104 | PYCO1 34R | 1-1, 236-360, 583-595 | - | |
| psp02605 | PYCO1 1,6R | 1-1, 83-160, 440-522, 583-595 | - | |
| psp02855 | PYCO1 12R | 1-1, 83-238, 583-595 | - | |
| psp02861 | PYCO1 6RC | 1-20, 442-595 | - | |
| psp01864 | PYCO1 56R W476A | 1-1, 359-522, 583-595 | W466A | |
| psp02186 | PYCO1 56R Y471A/W476A | 1-1, 359-522, 583-595 | Y461A, W466A | |
| psp04076 | PYCO1 56R R470A/R479A | 1-1, 359-522, 583-595 | R460A, R469A | |
| psp04211 | PYCO1 56R K469A/K475A | 1-1, 359-522, 583-595 | K459A, K465A | |
| psp05045 | PYCO1 56R Y431A/Y444A | 1-1, 359-522, 583-595 | Y421A, Y433A |
Orthologs and Paralogs
| ID | Name | Organism | Length |
|---|---|---|---|
| psp03426 | PYCO1 | Phaeodactylum tricornutum | 592 |
| psp00415 | PYCO1(W→A) | Phaeodactylum tricornutum | 592 |
| psp00469 | PYCO1(W/Y→A) | Phaeodactylum tricornutum | 592 |
| psp01185 | PYCO1(Y→A) | Phaeodactylum tricornutum | 592 |
Biophysical Features
The chart can zoom in and zoom out by mouse wheel.
IDR (Intrinsically Disordered Region) was predicted by Mobidb-lite 4.0, please refer to: MobiDB-lite 4.0: faster prediction of intrinsic protein disorder and structural compactness.
Pi-Pi interaction was predicted by PScore, please refer to: Pi-Pi contacts are an overlooked protein feature relevant to phase separation.
PLAAC and PrD. like were both predicted by PLAAC, please refer to: PLAAC: a web and command-line application to identify proteins with prion-like amino acid composition.
LCR (Low Complexity Region) was predicted by SEG, please refer to: Statistics of local complexity in amino acid sequences and sequence databases.
NCPR (Net Charge Per Residue), FCR (Fraction of Charged Residues) and hydrophobicity were both computated by CIDER, please refer to: CIDER: Resources to Analyze Sequence-Ensemble Relationships of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
Polarity was computated by ProtScale, please refer to: ProtScale.
SASA (Solvent-Accessible Surface Area) was computated by BioPython based on the predicted structure, please refer to: Bio.PDB.SASA module.
Protein Structure
Protein structure was predicted by Chai-1, which also produces predicted local distance difference test (pLDDT) score between 0 and 100.
For pLDDT, please refer to: pLDDT: Understanding local confidence